Use Cases
Real visibility, real impact.
Every organisation's digital footprint is unique, but attackers exploit the same weak spots: exposed services, leaked credentials, misconfigurations, and brand impersonation. See.Tech turns these exposures into clear, prioritised insights so you can understand your risk surface and act with confidence.
Agency
Safeguarding a creative agency's online presence.
A national creative agency engaged See.Tech to evaluate their cybersecurity posture. Our assessment delivered an overall score of 84/100, uncovering weaknesses that could expose them to reputational and operational risk.
Key issues included support for outdated TLS protocols, the absence of DKIM records in their email configuration, and multiple cybersquatting and typosquatting domains targeting their brand.
- Email security gaps: SPF and DMARC records were in place, but DKIM was not identified. Increasing the risk of spoofing and phishing.
- Outdated encryption: Legacy TLS 1.0 and 1.1 were still supported, alongside weak ciphers, resulting in only a B+ SSL/TLS grade.
- Brand abuse risks: Three cybersquatting domains and one typosquatting domain were found impersonating the agency.
- Vulnerability load: 28 vulnerabilities were detected in total, 6 moderate and 22 important.
- Positive results: No breached accounts or dark web exposures were found, confirming strong credential hygiene.
National
Protecting critical infrastructure from cyber threats.
A leading national organisation with a vast digital footprint had become an attractive target for cybercriminals. Through See.Tech's non-invasive cybersecurity assessment and proactive threat intelligence, the organisation gained a clear picture of its exposure.
With actionable insights and a prioritised roadmap, the organisation was able to tighten defences, reduce phishing incidents, and strengthen stakeholder trust, achieving measurable improvements in under 60 days.
- Email security gaps: Weak or missing authentication controls (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) left the organisation vulnerable to spoofed emails.
- Outdated encryption protocols: Legacy TLS support and weak cipher configurations exposed critical systems.
- Brand and domain impersonation: Typosquatting and cybersquatting domains were discovered.
- Vulnerability landscape: Moderate to important vulnerabilities were identified across internet-facing assets.
- Credential security: Dark web monitoring confirmed no active credential leaks, but underscored the need for ongoing surveillance.